Intervención reportada de la mensajería de la Sala de Casación Civil del TSJ

Qué respalda esta fuente

• AlbertoNews contemporaneously attributed the messaging-system incident to TeamHDP and reproduced statements attributed to the group
• the article says political messages were sent through the TSJ system and that TeamHDP claimed it downloaded personnel and collaborator information
• the article itself does not authenticate system access, the pictured interface or the claimed personnel-data download
• all six exact TeamHDP posts embedded by the article are now unavailable in the official X browser embed

Límites de la evidencia

This is the strongest preserved source for the TeamHDP attribution, but it is a secondary media report. The exact actor posts are unavailable, the image is unauthenticated, and no forensic or victim confirmation supports the personnel-data claim.

Relación con el caso

Retained as contemporaneous attribution and claim provenance; corrected from the impossible stored date of 1 August to the visible publication date of 16 August.

Qué respalda esta fuente

• 2001Online reported that attackers intervened in the Civil Chamber text-messaging service during Sunday afternoon, 15 August 2021
• the report says political messages were sent en masse to judges and quotes the message about 268 political prisoners and Óscar Pérez
• the report says technical support removed the messages and restored the service and that an investigation was ordered
• the report does not name TeamHDP, authenticate an actor claim, disclose an access vector or support personnel-data exfiltration

Límites de la evidencia

Strongest contemporaneous report, but still secondary and based on unnamed TSJ sources plus Últimas Noticias. It supports the reported event and remediation, not TeamHDP attribution or exfiltration.

Relación con el caso

Primary evidence role for the reported messaging intervention, date, message distribution and remediation, carefully bounded as a single secondary source family.

Qué respalda esta fuente

• The user-authored article presents TeamHDP as a Venezuelan group associated with attacks against state entities
• the article does not mention or support this August 2021 TSJ messaging incident
• its extensive allegations and screenshots are actor context rather than incident evidence

Límites de la evidencia

User-generated advocacy/accusation content with many unverified claims. It contributes only broad actor context and no row-93 incident fact.

Relación con el caso

Preserved for provenance as low-quality actor context; it must not be counted as corroboration of the TSJ event, attribution or exfiltration.

Qué respalda esta fuente

• The 2026 self-published OSINT retrospective repeats that TeamHDP accessed TSJ messaging, sent messages to judges and claimed to download personnel data
• the retrospective supplies no incident-specific forensic artifact, authenticated dataset or victim confirmation
• its row-93 account is retrospective and dependent on earlier media/actor claims

Límites de la evidencia

Retrospective self-published OSINT that repeats the incident and exfiltration allegations without incident-specific technical validation. It is not a primary source and was incorrectly marked high-confidence primary evidence.

Relación con el caso

Retained as later corroborating claim history, with its limitations explicit.