Ataque reportado e interrupción de sebastianasinsecretos.com

What this source supports

• Barráez reported in first person that sebastianasinsecretos.com had again been attacked and taken out of circulation
• she said this happened after publication of the ELN article
• the post establishes her public report and its timestamp, not the technical mechanism, actor, outage duration or data impact

Evidence limits

A first-person contemporaneous report is primary evidence that the victim made the outage/attack claim, but it is not forensic confirmation of cause or access.

Relevance to this case

Strongest source for the reported occurrence, sequence and public-report date.

What this source supports

• Espacio Público reported that the site was attacked after publication of the article
• the post says Barráez reported that this was not the first incident against her portal
• the card quotes the exact first-party Barráez post

Evidence limits

Institutional amplification two days later is corroborating evidence of the report, but it supplies no telemetry and is not independent of the quoted victim post.

Relevance to this case

Preserves the exact institutional post and corrects the chronology page's mistaken attribution of its timestamp to 25 April.

What this source supports

• The chronology records under 25 April that Barráez reported a cyberattack that left her site offline after publication of the ELN article
• it says this was not the first such report against her work

Evidence limits

The institutional chronology is useful secondary corroboration but cites Espacio Público's own derivative post and contains a two-day timestamp error.

Relevance to this case

Corroborates the victim report while preserving the exact date conflict and evidence chain.

What this source supports

• Pages 38–39 report that Barráez said her news site was attacked and remained offline after publication of the ELN article
• the report reproduces the exact victim X card
• a timeline elsewhere labels the case DDoS, but the target-specific narrative and reproduced post do not provide technical evidence for that mechanism

Evidence limits

A civil-society annual report corroborates the victim report and visually preserves the post; its DDoS label is not sufficient to replace an unknown vector.

Relevance to this case

Adds a durable PDF rendering of the contemporaneous claim and documents the unsupported DDoS characterization.

What this source supports

• Freedom House reports that Barráez created her own site to work around the Infobae block
• it says the site was targeted twice during 2019 and that she continued publishing elsewhere
• its target-specific claim is citation-based and does not establish method, actor, duration, recovery or data impact

Evidence limits

Strong institutional secondary reporting, but the incident statement ultimately depends on the victim account and publishes no technical evidence.

Relevance to this case

Corroborates repeated targeting in 2019 and the journalist's continuation on other platforms.

What this source supports

• The Spanish page reproduces Freedom House's statement that Barráez created the site to bypass the Infobae block
• it repeats that the site was attacked twice in 2019 and that she continued publishing elsewhere
• it is not independent incident corroboration

Evidence limits

Derivative Spanish access copy with a current-page date discrepancy; no additional technical or independent incident evidence.

Relevance to this case

Useful language-access copy of the Freedom House context only.

What this source supports

• The article existed on Infobae on 25 April 2019 and was authored by Sebastiana Barráez
• its subject was alleged ELN threats against people associated with the 1 May march
• the article itself does not mention sebastianasinsecretos.com, an attack, an outage or republication

Evidence limits

Primary evidence for the triggering article only; it does not corroborate the website incident.

Relevance to this case

Establishes the exact preceding publication and corrects the unsupported republication wording.