Leak of confidential information Claim date: Date confidence: Low

Divulgación de documentos no autenticados de la DGCIM atribuida a TeamHDP/System Failure

La divulgación de documentos presentados como informes y planes de la Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (DGCIM) sobre agentes y operaciones en Colombia fue atribuida a TeamHDP/System Failure en dos publicaciones del 14 de septiembre de 2021, que enlazaban el material. Dos publicaciones exactas de Tamara Suju amplificaron el material; los siete estados exactos de la cuenta del actor incorporados por una de esas publicaciones ya no están disponibles. Los quince archivos enlazados contienen material rotulado como DGCIM o contrainteligencia y perfiles personales, pero no existe autenticación oficial o forense, firma digital, cadena de custodia, hash del sistema de origen ni prueba del método de obtención. El SEBIN aparece sólo como mención contextual. La divulgación de más de 5.000 archivos de la Armada en junio de 2022 corresponde a un incidente distinto.

Overview

Missing evidence

confirmación oficial de la DGCIMfirma digital, metadata verificable o cadena de custodia que autentique los archivoshashes o registros del sistema de origenartefacto técnico, vector o prueba forense de acceso o extracciónvalidación independiente de las identidades, funciones y alegaciones contenidas en los perfilesconjunto independiente y exclusivo del SEBIN

Impact details

Quince archivos enlazados públicamente contienen documentos rotulados como DGCIM o contrainteligencia, planes de trabajo y perfiles personales alegados. Se verificó su publicación y contenido visible, no su autenticidad, procedencia, integridad, extracción ni origen de sistema. No hay evidencia de indisponibilidad o afectación operativa. La disponibilidad operacional permanece desconocida; no equivale a continuidad normal confirmada.

perfiles personales alegadamente vinculados a la DGCIMubicaciones, tareas y planes de trabajo alegadosinformes de contrainteligencia alegadospdfdocxppt

Classification & severity

Category
Information content security
Subtype
Leak of confidential information
Confidence
Medium

Varias fuentes publicaron archivos y páginas presentados como documentos confidenciales de la DGCIM y atribuyeron la divulgación a TeamHDP. La presencia pública del material está verificada, pero su autenticidad, origen, extracción y acceso al sistema no.

Severity assessment

Medium
Information impact
Government-sensitive
Affected scope
Organization-wide
Critical service
None
Public confidence
Limited

La publicación incluye material presentado como sensible y perfiles personales alegadamente vinculados a una entidad de inteligencia, lo que podría ser serio si fuera auténtico. La autenticidad, origen, acceso, alcance y efecto real no están confirmados y no se reportó interrupción operativa.

Data exfiltration· Claimed

Timeline

Claim

DataConfirmada y TheFreedomPost publicaron la reclamación atribuida a TeamHDP/System Failure y documentos presentados como material de la DGCIM. La publicación está verificada; la autenticidad y el origen de los archivos y el acceso no.

Publication

Infobae reprodujo un reporte de Israel Hayom sobre supuestos registros de la DGCIM relacionados con personas alegadamente vinculadas a Hezbollah; la cadena depende del actor y de fuentes anónimas y no autentica los datos.

Evidence & sources

6 sources
Primary Media report Source confidence: Medium

What this source supports

  • DataConfirmada said its newsroom received confidential DGCIM-related material and publicly linked seven DOCX reports and one PPT work plan
  • the article describes more than 100 pages containing alleged names, profiles, locations, tasks and work plans concerning Colombia
  • all eight direct files are currently accessible and contain alleged DGCIM or military-counterintelligence report and work-plan material
  • the publication does not authenticate the files, prove their source system or demonstrate how they were acquired

Evidence limits

Strongest public artifact source, but it is a media publisher and recipient of alleged files, not an official repository or forensic examiner. Internal labels and contents do not prove authenticity, completeness, origin or unauthorized access.

Relevance to this case

Retained as primary publication evidence for the public document set and corrected from the unsupported 1 September date to visible 14 September metadata.

Corroborating Media report Source confidence: Medium

What this source supports

  • The contemporaneous article reported a TeamHDP/System Failure claim involving alleged DGCIM documents and operations in Colombia
  • two exact Tamara Suju amplification posts are visibly available and one displays an alleged document page
  • all seven exact actor-account posts currently return Not found; article transcriptions preserve claims but are not direct browser verification
  • the article does not authenticate the document image, actor identity, access or source-system provenance

Evidence limits

Contemporaneous opposition/activist reporting and social amplification. The target documents and actor claims are public, but the article provides no forensic or official authentication.

Relevance to this case

Retained for the earliest contemporaneous publication/claim phase and exact-post provenance, carefully separated from proof of an intrusion.

Tamara Suju amplifica documentos atribuidos a la DGCIM

Tamara Suju / @TAMARA_SUJU Sep 14, 2021
Corroborating Social media Source confidence: Medium

What this source supports

  • The visible post says hackers obtained documents alleging more than 200 DGCIM agents conducting intelligence, espionage and sabotage work in Colombia
  • the attached image depicts one alleged confidential report page
  • the post amplifies the document claim but does not authenticate the file, prove system access or establish TeamHDP as the intruder

Evidence limits

Independent public amplification of alleged material, not forensic verification or an official statement.

Relevance to this case

Added as an exact browser-verified contemporaneous post supporting publication history only.

Context Social media Source confidence: Low

What this source supports

  • The visible post quotes the earlier document-amplification post and calls on Colombian authorities to denounce alleged foreign intelligence activity
  • it repeats the same alleged document image and adds no independent technical validation

Evidence limits

Advocacy/amplification post dependent on the preceding allegation and unauthenticated document image.

Relevance to this case

Added as exact context for the public response, not as confirmation of an attack.

#teamHDP — Venezuelan hacker group exposes DCGIM and SEBIN

The Cyber Shafarat / Treadstone 71 Sep 17, 2021
Corroborating Media report Source confidence: Medium

What this source supports

  • The article publicly attributed a DGCIM/SEBIN document disclosure to TeamHDP and described alleged profiles, locations, tasks and work plans
  • all seven linked PDFs are currently accessible and together contain 160 pages of DGCIM-labelled reports/profile pages and a work-plan presentation
  • the files demonstrate public availability of alleged material but do not authenticate its origin, completeness, source system or acquisition
  • the detailed material is DGCIM-focused; SEBIN is a broad contextual allegation rather than a separately evidenced dataset

Evidence limits

Security/intelligence commentary relaying actor-supplied or source-supplied material. The documents are publicly readable and internally labelled, but there is no digital signature, authoritative provenance, source-system hash, forensic chain or DGCIM confirmation.

Relevance to this case

Retained as evidence of public document publication and the claim narrative, not as confirmation of an intrusion or authentic government records.

What this source supports

  • Infobae reported that TeamHDP alleged access to DGCIM databases and described alleged Hezbollah-linked records
  • the article explicitly depends on an Israel Hayom report by Damian Pachter, a TeamHDP member and unnamed or former intelligence sources
  • the source does not independently authenticate access, the alleged records, their origin or the named-person allegations

Evidence limits

Secondary derivative reporting based on an actor member and unnamed sources. It supports later public reporting, not forensic validation or official confirmation.

Relevance to this case

Retained for the October reporting phase and its explicit source dependence; downgraded from high confidence.